Feed dealers and feed sack Rss

Featured Posts

The Pet Food Ingredient Game About 25 years ago I began formulating pet foods at a time when the entire pet food industry seemed quagmire and focused on such things as protein and fat percentages without any real regard for ingredients. Since boot leather and soap could make a pet food with the "ideal" percentages, it was clear that analytical percentages do not end...

Read more

Eating Healthful Red Meat Is An Effective Yeast Infection... One who dines on lots of beef should be prepared for a lot more infections. An effective natural cure yeast infection happens to be to consume small portions of beef every month. Research studies have shown antibiotics destroy bacteria. Ranchers give young cattle antibiotics to assist in keeping young cattle healthy. Folks do not read...

Read more

Buffalo Meat is Actually Good for You Buffalo meat I sure didn't know much about it until I spoke with Dan Marino of Jackson Hole Buffalo Meat Co for help visit www. bread-bakers-assistant. com. I had the opportunity to pick his brain about buffalo meat, how it compares to beef and ask about taste. I think you will find his responses both surprising and interesting. I'm calling...

Read more

Living on Bread Alone A fox uses a lot of energy chasing a rabbit but that energy is replaced after catching and eating the rabbit. If it wasn’t replaced the fox would starve to death. If a person works hard for a dollar that dollar must allow him to buy enough food to regain his strength, or he would never be able to return to his job. That is why all workers...

Read more

The Pet Food Ingredient Game

Category : feed additives

About 25 years ago I began formulating pet foods at a time when the entire pet food industry seemed quagmire and focused on such things as protein and fat percentages without any real regard for ingredients. Since boot leather and soap could make a pet food with the “ideal” percentages, it was clear that analytical percentages do not end the story about pet food value. I was convinced then, as I am now, that a food can be no better than the ingredients of which it is composed. Since this ingredient idea has caught on in the pet food industry, it has taken on a commercial life that distorts and perverts the meaning of the underlying philosophy of food quality and proper feeding practices. Is health reducible to which ingredients a commercial product does or does not have? As contradictory as it may seem to what I have just said, no it is not. Here’s why.

AAFCO Approval

The official Publication of the American Association of Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) gives wide latitude for ingredients that can be used in animal foods. As I have pointed out in my book, The Truth About Pet Foods, approved ingredients can include*:

dehydrated garbage

undried processed animal waste products

polyethylene roughage replacement (plastic)

hydrolyzed poultry feathers

hydrolyzed hair

hydrolyzed leather meal

poultry hatchery by-product

meat meal tankage

peanut hulls

ground almond shells

(*Association of American Feed Control Officials, 1998 Official Publication)

Simultaneously, this same regulatory agency prohibits the use of many proven beneficial natural ingredients that one can find readily available for human consumption such as bee pollen, glucosamine, L-carnitine, spirulina and many other nutraceuticals. It would be easy to conclude that reason does not rule when it comes to what officially can or cannot be used in pet foods.

From the regulators’ standpoint, they operate from the simplistic nutritional idea that the value of food has to do with percentages and that there is no special merit to any particular ingredient. They deny the tens of thousands of scientific research articles proving that the kind of ingredient and its quality can make all the difference in terms of health. They also are silent about the damaging effect of food processing and the impact of time, light, heat, oxygen and packaging on nutritional and health value.

So regulators are certainly not the place to go to determine how to feed pets for health. For their way of thinking, as long as a packaged food achieves certain percentages, regardless of ingredients, the manufacturer can claim the food is 100% complete. Pet owners then proceed to confidently feed such guaranteed foods at every meal thinking all the while they are doing the right thing for their pet. This old school nutritional view is standard practice in human hospitals as well where official dieticians feed diseased and metabolically starved patients a fare of jello, instant potatoes, powdered eggs, white flour rolls and oleomargarine because their charts say such diets contain the correct percentages of certain nutrients. Hospitals are a good place to go if you want to get sick!

The 100% Complete Myth

Consumers are increasingly becoming alert to the value of more natural foods. Everyone intuitively knows that the closer the diet is to real, fresh, wholesome foods, the better the chance that good health will result. Unfortunately, people do not apply this same common sense to pet foods. Instead they purchase “100% complete” processed foods, perhaps even going the extra mile and selecting “super premium” or “natural” brands, thinking they are doing the best that can be done. They surrender their mind to a commercial ploy (100% completeness) and do to their pets what they would never do to themselves or their family – eat the same packaged product at every meal, day in and day out. No processed food can be “100% complete” because there is not a person on the planet who has 100% knowledge of nutrition. The claim on its face is absurd. Understanding this simple principle is more important than any pet food formulation regardless of the merits of its ingredients. Everything that follows will begin with that premise, i. e. , no food should be fed exclusively on a continuous basis no matter what the claims of completeness or ingredient quality.

Genetics Is The Key

Pets need the food they are biologically adapted to. It’s a matter of context. Just as a fish needs to be in water to stay healthy, a pet needs its natural food milieu to be healthy. All creatures must stay true to their design. What could be more obvious or simple? For a carnivore the correct genetic match is prey, carrion and incidental fresh plant material, and even some fur and feathers, as well as the occasional surprise of unmentionables found in decaying matter. It’s not a pretty picture to think that “FiFi” with her pink bow and polished toenails would stoop to such fare, but that is precisely the food she is designed to eat. Since that is her design, matching food to that design (minus the more disgusting and unnecessary elements) is also the key to her health.

The Disease Price

We may prefer to feed a packaged, sterile, steam- cleaned, dried, farinaceous chunk cleverly shaped like a pork chop, but let’s not kid ourselves, that is not the food a pet is designed for. . . . regardless of the claims about ingredients on the label making one think it is five-star restaurant fare. Pets may tolerate such food for a time, but in the end nature calls to account. The price to be paid is lost health in the form of susceptibility to infections, dental disease, premature aging, obesity, heart and organ disease, diabetes, cancer, arthritis and other cruel and painful chronic degenerative diseases. Because our pets are not out in the rigors of nature where they would quickly succumb to such conditions and end their misery, they languish in our protected homes and under veterinary care that does not usually cure but merely treats symptoms and extends the time of suffering. That suffering begins with the way in which we are feeding our pets, not the ingredients in a supposed 100% complete pet food.

The Perfect Food

What is the solution? It is simple and something I have been preaching for the past 25 years. Return pets to their environmental roots. They need – daily – interesting activity, fresh air, clean water, romps in nature, lots of love, and food as close to the form they would find in the wild as possible. Fresh, whole natural foods fit for a carnivore and fed in variety are as good as it can get. Anything less than that is a compromise. Compromise the least if health is the goal. (Same principle applies to you and your family. ) To get a packaged food as close as possible to that goal requires the right starting philosophy of feeding (described above) and the expertise to design and manufacture such foods.

Enter The Profiteers

Elements of these principles (often distorted or misunderstood) have been taken up by an endless line of pet food entrepreneurs. The low fat craze led to low fat pet foods. The high fiber craze led to high fiber pet foods. The “no corn, wheat or soy” craze led to no corn, wheat or soy pet foods. The “omega- 3″ craze led to pet foods with fish oil. The “variety” craze led to pet foods supposedly offering variety. The “four food groups” craze led to all four bundled into a package. The “raw” craze has led to raw frozen pet foods. The list is endless and the race for pet owner dollars is at a fever pitch.

One can only feel sympathy for a concerned pet owner as they stroll along the huge array of pet food options in pet food aisles. Unfortunately, armed with only sound bites and lore they may have heard from a friend, breeder, veterinarian or on a commercial, they make choices that not only do not serve the health of their pet but may directly contribute to weakened immunity and disease.

The first thing consumers should keep in mind is the ideal diet for pets as described above. No packaged product regardless of its wild claims is ever going to equal that. The next best thing is to home prepare fresh meals. (Contact Wysong for recipes and instruction. ) If that is not always possible, then products should be selected that are as close to the ideal as possible. (More suggestions below. )

Raw Frozen Pet Food Dangers

At first glance, considering the perfect feeding model I have described – raw, natural, whole – the best food may seem to be one of the raw frozen pet foods now clamoring to capture the “raw” craze. I’m sorry to say that some of these purveyors even use my books and literature to convince pet owners that their frozen products are on track. They take bits and pieces of good information and distort it into something that pretty much misses the point and misleads consumers. Also, these exotic frozen mixtures of ingredients of unknown origin, manufacturing and freezing conditions are most certainly not economical nor the best choice. They may, because of the water content and raw state, be outright dangerous.

[The Case Against Raw Frozen Pet Foods]

http://www. wysong. net/PDFs/caserawfrozen. pdf

Natural And Organic

At second glance then, it may appear that the next best thing would be one of the many “natural,” “organic” and “human-grade” dried or canned brands that are now flooding the market. Between these and the frozen food products, ingredient labels start to look outright ridiculous. For example, these are from some typical labels:

Every manner of “pureed” vegetable

Organic beef, rabbit, chicken, turkey, goat, lamb, duck, pork

Organic eggs

Organic honey

Organic papaya, persimmons, blueberries, oranges, apples, pears

Organic yogurt

Organic alfalfa, millet, quinoa and barley sprouts

Wheat grass

Nettles

Bok Choy

Cultured kefir

Cod liver oil

Capsicum

Watermelon. . . .

Everything but the kitchen sink is put in so as not to risk losing any customer . . . and that would be in there too if a new myth appeared about the special health attributes of porcelain. I say the list is ridiculous not because such ingredients may not be wonderfully nutritious but because the consumer does not really know what part of the ingredient is being put in, in what form, how it is being protected from degradation and toxin formation and, as you will see below, the economic math does not add up. Additionally, feeding complex mixtures of foods (grains, meats, vegetables, fruit, dairy, etc. ) at every meal is a digestive stress. Pets need a break once in a while and should have just a meat meal, a slice of watermelon or whatever fits their fancy, all alone so their digestive tract can focus and they can relish the flavor of an actual food.

Although the idea of organic agriculture is excellent, the use of the “organic” name just for marketing isn’t. Something may be labeled organic to entice customers but only contain a small percentage of organic (see below). Or, it may be that the particular organic ingredient may be of low nutritional merit – chicken heads, feet and feathers can be “organic. ” Regardless, even if the food is 100% organic prime rib, that is not an argument for the exclusive feeding of the food to pets.

Human Grade

Then there are claims about “USDA approved” ingredients, “human grade” ingredients and ingredients purchased right out of the meat counter at the grocery store. Again, at first glance – and superficiality is what marketers like to deal with – it may seem that such foods would have merit over others. But such labels only create a perception of quality. People would not consider the food pets are designed for in the wild – whole, raw prey and carrion – “human grade” or “USDA approved. ” Because something is not “human grade” does not mean it is not healthy or nutritious. For example, chicken viscera is not “human grade” but carries more nutritional value than a clean white chicken breast. Americans think that chicken feet would not be fit for human consumption but many far eastern countries relish them. On the other hand, “human grade” beef steaks fed to pets could cause serious nutritional imbalances and disease if fed exclusively. Pet foods that create the superficial perception of quality (USDA, human grade, etc. ) with the intent of getting pet owners to feed a particular food exclusively is not what health is about.

There are also the larger concerns of the Earth’s dwindling food resources and swelling population. Should “human grade” food products be taken out of the mouths of people and fed to pets with all of the excellent nutritional non-”human grade” ingredients put in the garbage?

Think about the humane aspect of converting all pet food to “human grade. ” Millions of tons of pet foods are produced each year. Should cows, pigs, sheep, fish, chickens and other sentient creatures be raised and slaughtered for these foods? Or should the perfectly good and nutritious by-products from human meat processing be used rather than wasted? Why would caring and sensitive pet owners and pet food producers want other creatures – that are themselves capable of being pets – needlessly raised in factory farm confinement and slaughtered when alternative sources of meat are available?

Pet Nutrition Is Serious Health Science

Pet nutrition is not about marketing and who can make the most money quickly. Unfortunately an aspiring pet food mogul off the street can go to any number of private label manufacturers and have a new brand made. These manufacturers have many stock formulas that can be slightly modified to match the current market trend. Voilà! A new pet food wonder brand is created.

Pet foods are about pet nutrition, and nutrition is a serious health matter. There is an implied ethic in going to market with products that can so seriously impact health. But the ethic is by and large absent in the pet food industry. Starting with the 100% claim and on to all the fad driven brands that glut the shelves, health is not being served. Nobody other than our organization is teaching people the principles I am discussing here. Instead, companies headed by people with no real technical, nutritional, food processing or health skills put themselves out to the public as serious about health . . . because that is what the public wants to hear and what sells. Never mind whether producers really understand or can implement healthy principles. The façade sells and selling is the game. Ingredients are important, true, but not less important than the expertise and principles of the producer who is choosing them, preparing, storing, processing and packaging them. Consumers place a lot of trust that nondescript processed nuggets are what consumers are being led to believe they are. Many a slip can occur between the cup and the lip. There are many slips that can occur between the cup of commercial claims and what ends up in the lips of the pet food bowl.

Consumer Blame

The consumer is not without guilt in this unfortunate – steady diet of processed pet food – approach to pet feeding. They want everything easy and inexpensive. They don’t want to learn or have to expend too much effort, and they want something simple to base decisions on like: “corn, wheat and soy are evil,” or “USDA approved,” or “human grade” or “organic is good. ” They also want something for nothing and think they can get it in a pet food. People want prime choice meats, organic and fresh foods all wrapped up tidy in an easy open, easy pour package, hopefully for 50 cents a pound. They may even pay $1 or a little more if the producer can convince them about how spectacular their product is or how much cancer their pet will get if they choose another brand.

Doing The Math

Now when I go to the grocer or health food store and find these types of ingredients in raw, unprocessed, fresh packaged form, I don’t see hardly anything for $1 a pound, let alone 50 cents. Some of the organic meats are more than $15 a pound! Something’s afoul. But people are just not putting two and two together. How could a producer buy such expensive ingredients (as they are leading the public to believe they do) transport them to their “human grade” factory, grind, mix, extrude, retort, freeze, package, ship, advertise and pay salespeople and hefty margins to distributors, brokers and retailers and then sell them at retail for less than the cost of the bare starting materials? They can’t. So obviously manufactured pet foods making such claims are misleading (to put it gently). They may have organic filet mignon and caviar in the food but it would have to be an inconsequential sprinkle at best. Consumers must do the math and get realistic in their expectations.

Are By-Products Evil?

In the processing of human foods there are thousands of tons of by-products that cannot be readily sold to humans. Does that make them useless or even inferior? No. Such by-products could include trimmings, viscera, organs, bones, gristle and anything else that humans do not desire. Should these perfectly nutritious items be buried in a landfill? As I mentioned above, while Earth’s resources continue to decline and people starve around the globe, should we feed our pets only “human grade” foods and let perfectly edible – and sometimes even more nutritious – by-products go to waste? How is that conscionable or justifiable for either the consumer or the producer?

Road Kill and Euthanized Pets

This shift to “human grade” for pet foods is partly due to a variety of myths that have gotten much stronger legs than they deserve. Lore has spread in the marketplace that road kill and euthanized pets are used in pet foods. I have never seen the proof for this outrageous claim and after twenty years surveying ingredient suppliers I have never found a supplier of such. However, fantastic myths easily get life and the more fantastic they are the more life they have. It’s the intellectually lazy way and what lies at the root of so much misery. Sloppy superficial thinking is what leads to racism, sexism, religious persecution and wars. People would like to think the world is sharply divided into right-wrong, good-evil, black-white. Marketers capitalize on this by trying to create such sharp distinctions for consumers to easily grab on to: human grade = good/all others = evil; organic = right/all others = wrong; rice = white/corn and wheat = black. Such simplistic and naïve distinctions are quick and simple for advertisers and salespeople to use to sway public opinion. But nobody stepping back and using common sense would ever think that something as complex as health could ever come from what is or is not in a processed bag of food. Reality is not black or white; it is in shades of gray. Grayness requires some knowledge, judgment and discernment before making choices. It’s a little more work but is what we all must do if the world is ever to be a better place and people and pet health are to improve.

Digests, Meals And Other Boogeymen

Many producers attempt to sell their products by claiming they contain no “digests” or “meals. ” The idea is that these are wicked ingredients and consumers should stay away from all products that contain them. A digest is a product created when enzymes break down foods. After you eat a meal and it is subjected to the acids and enzymes in the digestive tract it becomes a “digest. ” Fermented (digested) foods made from soy, dairy and vegetables are among the most nutritious of all foods. Some “primitive” peoples bury food in the ground to rot and ferment and then uncover it later to consume it with great savor and nutritional benefit. Scavengers survive, and survive quite well, on fermenting, rotting and digesting foods. Meats, organs and trimmings can be likewise digested in vats creating both liquid and dried forms of commercial pet food digests. Being predigested they are highly concentrated and nutritionally efficient. If we are to listen to the taste buds of pets they would vote yes on digests since they find them highly palatable.

A “meal” is a food product that has been ground, mixed and dried. Meals are often used in pet foods because they are stable, easily transported, stored and handled. Dried pet foods themselves are ground, mixed and dried meals. So that makes an interesting dilemma for those who promote their products as having no meals. As far as processed pet food ingredients go, meals and digests can have their merits. There are degrees of quality as there are with any ingredient. There may be better options such as using fresh whole ingredients, but focusing on finding a product without digests or meals and feeding it exclusively is not the key to health. Given in sufficient dose, anything can be toxic and dangerous, even water and oxygen. Healthy food is a mixed bag of variety, form, preparation, quality, balance . . . and reason, not fear mongering or sensationalism.

4D

There is concern about dead, dying, downed (disabled) or diseased (4D) animals being used in pet foods. Other than the fact that this just does not “sound” like wholesome food, there is the concern that these animals may contain drugs or communicable pathogens (although this can be true of “human grade” ingredients as well). My point here will not be to defend unwholesome or dangerous meats but to give some perspective. As you are learning in this paper, just about every marketing angle used by pet food manufacturers is more sensationalism than it is substance. What does a carnivore eat in the wild? Is their diet only the strongest, most robust, fastest, healthiest and most elusive prey? Of course not. They seek and primarily feed upon the dead, dying, down and diseased – 4D prey. That’s exactly what humans who are alone in the wild, faced with survival, seek as well. Also, consider this, one of the largest markets for 4D meat is racing greyhounds. Not only are 4D meats fed, they are fed raw. Would kennels that make their living on the athletic performance of their animals feed foods that diseased their superstars or did not create results? These owners could buy commercial concoctions not containing 4D meat at the same price or less, but they don’t. There’s a reason.

If a cow breaks a leg in the field and is down, should it be killed and hauled to a landfill? How about a chicken breast that was bruised on the processing line? Should they all be taken to a landfill because they might be called “4D,” “by-products” or “non- human grade?” What is the ethic in discarding a creature that has in essence sacrificed its life for food? That’s not how nature does it. Nothing is wasted.

But the supposed evilness of “4D” makes great marketing fodder and soap boxes for some who need a cause or a conspiracy to promote. People don’t like the sound of “4D,” ” by-products,” or “non-human grade. ” Producers know this and play to it. Thus begins the race to see who can get to market first with “USDA approved” and “human grade” pet food labels. Whether it really has anything to do with health is not important. Perception and propaganda create profits.

(To put such fear mongering in perspective, consider that over 500,000 people [proportionate numbers in animals], the equivalent of more than five per day of our largest jet liners packed full, die each year as a result of modern medical measures [doctors, drugs, hospitals]. Yet we hear more fear and commotion about boogeyman food ingredients that rarely, if ever, take a life. You figure it.

[Why Modern Medicine Is the Greatest Threat To Life]

http://www. wysong. net/health/hl_884. shtml

To repeat, none of this is intended to diminish the need for wholesome and nutritious ingredients for pets or humans. But the buzzwords currently bandied about – “human grade,” “4D,” “by-products,” “USDA approved” and the like – do not provide the proper criteria for decision making and only mislead consumers into thinking health and good nutrition are only a phrase on a package away.

What To Do

How do concerned pet owners wanting to cut through all the marketing clutter negotiate a path? It is very simple if the basic principles I have discussed above are kept in mind. Here are tips on how to implement an intelligent health and feeding philosophy:

1. Learn how to feed fresh food. Alternate these with honest processed foods fed in variety, and complement these foods with well- designed supplements.

[How To Apologize To Your Pet]

http://www. wysong. net/PDFs/apology_pamphlet. pdf

Don’t get all particular and paranoid about balancing nutrients and ingredient do’s and don’ts. Rotate, vary, mix it up and fast once in a while. Trust in nature, not some marketing hype. (Use the same principles for yourself and your family if you want optimal health as well. )

2. If you must have human grade or organic foods for your pet, go buy the real thing at the grocery meat counter. Take it home, cut it up and feed it raw. Freeze the remainder into small meal portions and use them for subsequent meals. Don’t turn your brain off and go buy “organic” or “human grade” pet foods that for their cost could only contain hints of the real thing. Pet food manufacturers may be clever at marketing, but they are not magicians. One thing is certain; they do not buy ingredients and then sell them to you for less than what they buy them for.

3. Use appropriately designed supplements such as Call Of The Wild™ and Wild Things™ to balance raw meals and help make them safe if you are not skilled at such meal preparation.

4. The best raw, processed food alternative to fresh foods from the grocer is non-thermally processed dry foods – not raw frozen ones. (See Wysong Archetype™. ) Use this food for alternate meals and as top dressing to heat processed foods.

5. Check the credentials of the person making the decisions in the company whose products you buy. Don’t go to a plumber for brain surgery and don’t expect serious healthy products from business people.

6. Steer away from brands that are pushing any particular hot buttons such as “natural,” “no by- products,” exotic ingredients (quail eggs, watermelon, persimmons, etc. ), organic, omega-3, rice and the like. Although these features may bring some merit to a food (if they are put in at other than “pinch” levels), they are not an end in themselves and if the packaged food is fed exclusively can cause more harm than good.

7. Steer away from brands that fear monger. For example, there is the no corn or wheat scam – “buy our brand; it has no corn or wheat. ” (Just saying a product has “no” something is enough to scare the non-thinking public to the brand that doesn’t have the boogeyman ingredient. Profiteers know this and play it to the hilt in the pet food industry. ) The truth is, grains are put in dried nugget foods because they contain the starch necessary for the extrusion process. Starch is pretty much starch regardless of whether it comes from corn, wheat, rice, potatoes, millet or whatever. Grains also help decrease the cost of pet foods. They contribute some nutrition but in a properly formulated meat-based pet food the majority of the nutritional value comes from the meat. It is true that animals may develop allergy to corn or wheat but that can happen with rice or any other grain or ingredient as well. Problems are prevented by varying the diet. That is why Wysong has developed the range of formulations it has and puts them in small portion packs so the foods can be rotated. Of all the Wysong formulations, the ones with corn are chosen on almost a 5:1 ratio over all others and are the diets we receive the thousands of raves about, even in those pets supposedly allergic to corn!

[Wysong Testimonials]

http://www. wysong. net/testimonials. shtml

This is not to tout the merit of corn, or any grain in pet food for that matter. They are sort of a necessary evil in dried extruded foods and any of them can bring some benefit if rotated in the diet.

8. Do not feed any product exclusively. Variety is the spice of nutrition and the road to good health.

9. Features to look for in a packaged product would be those that bring the product close to the raw-whole-fresh-natural standard described above: active enzymes, probiotics cultures, natural preservation and protection against food-borne pathogens, proper packaging, intelligent formulation and balance, micronutrient dense, freshly produced, fresh ingredients – and the expertise to do all of this, not just say so on a package or brochure. (Some brands trying to get on the raw food bandwagon make outright false claims about “cold” processing. )

10. The company should be able to intelligently explain what they are doing in terms of processing, packaging, product preservation and prevention of food-borne pathogens. It is one thing to simply put a certain ingredient into a food, quite another to protect it until it is consumed. For example, Wysong owns its own manufacturing facilities in order to go beyond industry standard techniques. Special portion pack, light- and oxygen- barrier bags, modified atmosphere flush and natural ingredients to prevent oxidation and food- borne pathogens are part of all Wysong products. (See technical monographs on Packaging, Antioxidants and Wyscin™. )

11. Most important, learn. Support a company that helps you learn the truth and teaches you how to be at least somewhat independent of commercial products. Demand that producers provide proof for their claims in the form of good logic, evidence and science. Try to discern the company’s true motives, your pocketbook or your pet’s health. Learn how to go beyond The Pet Food Ingredient Game.

Wysong R. L. (1993). Rationale for Animal Nutrition. Midland, MI: Inquiry Press.

Wysong, R. L. (2002, June 19). Why Modern Medicine is The Greatest Threat to Health. The Wysong e-Health letter. Wysong Institute, Midland, MI.

[The Wysong e-Health letter]

http://www. wysong. net/health/hl_884. shtml

Wysong, R. L. (2002). The Truth About Pet Foods. Midland, MI: Inquiry Press.

Wysong, R. L. (2004). Nutrition is a Serious Health Matter: The serious responsibility of manufacturing and selling. Midland, MI: Inquiry Press.

Wysong, R. L. (2004). The Thinking Person’s Master Key to Health (60 Minute CD Discussion) Wysong Institute, Midland, MI.

Wysong, R. L. (2005). Comparing Pet Foods Based Upon What Matters: The First Study of its Kind in the Pet Food Industry. Midland, MI: Inquiry Press.

Wysong, R. L. & Savant, V. (2005). The Case AGAINST Raw Frozen Pet Foods. Midland, MI: Inquiry Press.

For further reading, or for more information about, Dr Wysong and the Wysong Corporation please visit www. wysong. net or write to wysong@wysong. net. For resources on healthier foods for people including snacks, and breakfast cereals please visit www. cerealwysong. com.


Feed dealers

Pet food and what is inside?

Category : feed additives

This report examines the differences between what consumers think they are buying and what they actually receive. It focuses on the most visible name brands – the pet food labels to mass-distributed to supermarkets and shops are – but there are many highly regarded brands, can be guilty of the same crimes.

What most consumers do not know that the pet food industry’s expansion into food and agriculture industries. Pet food provides a convenient way to the slaughterhouse offal, grains used for “inedible” waste has become like a profit. This waste includes intestines, udders, heads, hooves, and possibly diseased and cancerous animal parts.

Players

The pet food market has been dominated in recent years through the acquisition of large companies by large companies. 15000000000 in the game with the $ U.S. and the fast-growing overseas markets, it is no wonder that some are more greedy piece of the pie.

Other major pet food makers in Pet Care is the best known, although many of their household and personal care products, do not use ingredients produced from animal by-products:

Private Labeler (who make food the “house” brands like Kröger and Wal-Mart) and co-packers (who produce food Other pet food manufacturers) are also major players. Three majors, Doane Pet Care, Diamond, and Menu Foods, they produce food, and dozens of private label brands. It is interesting that all three of these companies have been linked to pet food recalls that are ill, or killed many pets.

Many major pet food companies in the United States are subsidiaries of giant multinational corporations. From the business point of view, very suitable for pet food company, the products of human origin. International bulk buying power has grown, these foods have a captive market for these products make use of waste and pet food divisions have a solid capital base and, in many cases, a convenient source of ingredients.

Pet Food Institute – producers of pet food – have recognized the use of by-products in pet foods as additional income for farmers and processors, “growth in the pet food industry not only for pet owners better food intended for pet animals, but also created additional profitable markets for U.S. agricultural products and by-products in meat processing, poultry and other food products, food produced for human consumption. “1

There are special labeling requirements for pet food, all of which are annually revised Official Publications of the AAFCO. 2 While AAFCO does not regulate pet food, which gives the model regulations and standards that are followed by U.S. pet food makers.

Food provides the name of the first signs of food content. Use the word “all” or “100%” can not be used “if the product is more than one component, which does not contain enough water for processing or monitoring agents decharacterizing preservatives and spices.”

“95% rule” applies when the ingredient (s) of animals, poultry, fish, or have obtained a minimum of 95% or more of the total weight of the product (or 70% excluding water for processing). Because all-meat diet is a balanced diet and lead to serious deficiencies, if fed exclusively fell out of favor for many years. But as the growing consumer interest in high-quality meat products, many companies are now promoting 95% and 100% preserved meat, such as feeding option.

“Dinner” product is defined as “25% rule” which applies when “an ingredient or a combination of ingredients for at least 25% by weight of goods (excluding water sufficient for processing) or at least a 10% fall, and the keyword” recipe “,” saucer “,” Appetizer “and” formula. “combination of ingredients in the product name is entered in an acceptable, if the individual components are likely to at least 3% by weight, excluding water for processing the ingredient name in descending order by weight.

“With” rule allows an ingredient on the label’s name, as “pretty chicken” as long as each of these components represents probably less than 3% of the food by weight, excluding water for processing.

“Flavor” rule allows a food ingredient (s named a flavor for so long) that are sufficient to “make specific” to eat. Such a “beef flavor” food contains a digest of small cattle, or other tissues, or even a statement of artificial flavors, even without a real beef.

The list of ingredients is another important key, which is actually in the bag or not. Ingredients in descending order by weight must be listed. Ingredient names are legally defined. For example, “meat” refers to only cows, pigs, goats and sheep, and contains only the absence of muscle. A detailed definition of the AAFCO Official Gazette, amend, published annually, but there are also many places online.

Guaranteed Analysis gives a very general picture of the composition of the diet. Crude protein, fat and fiber, to a total moisture content, are listed. Some companies also voluntarily list taurine, omega fatty acids, magnesium and other elements that they consider important – marketing.

Pet Food Standards and regulations

National Research Council (NRC) is an Academy of Sciences of the nutritional standards for pet foods that are used by the pet food industry until the 1980th The original NRC standards are based on purified diets, and made the required feeding trials for pet foods claimed “complete” and “balanced”. Pet food industry found the feeding trials too restrictive and expensive, so AAFCO designed an alternate procedure for claiming the nutritional adequacy of a member of pet food, by testing with foods’ nutritional profiles. ” AAFCO also created “expert committees” for dog and cat food, cats, dogs, and separate standards developed.

During feeding trials, sometimes still, they are expensive and time consuming. Standard chemical analysis can also be used to ensure that the nutrient profiling can be met. In any case, it is specified on the label declaration of the method used. However, as the “family rule”, the AAFCO book, the label may say that the feeding experiments were carried out, if it is “similar” to the food, which was actually tested on live animals. Not so, lead product in its “distinguished members of the family.” The label also indicate whether the product is equipped with an adequate diet (this is a complete and balanced), and what life stage (adult or growth) is the food. Food, says: “all life stages” meets the standards for growth and can be fed at all times.

Chemical analysis, but not the taste, digestibility, or biological availability of nutrients in the diet. Thus, to determine whether the animal has enough food to provide nutrients for sound. To compensate for the restrictions on a chemical analysis, AAFCO added “safety factor” was the minimal nutrients needed to gain a complete and balanced requirements.

In 2006, the new NRC standards were published, but it will take some years AAFCO’s profile has been updated and validated, not to mention the host countries.

Pet food industry say that it is more regulated than the food, but it’s not just true. Pet food is a bit of a legal vacuum, law books, but enforcement is another story. The FDA has a nominal power of pet foods shipped across state borders. But the real “Enforcer” feed control officials in each country. They are the ones who are actually engaged in food and in many cases, perform basic tests to ensure that the food meets the guaranteed analysis on the label in the table to say how much protein, fat, fiber and moisture are present. However, regulation and enforcement vary considerably from one Member State. Some, like Texas, Minnesota, Kentucky and lead to extensive testing and strict enforcement of its laws, others, like California, but not both.

Dry Food

Most dry food is made from a machine called extruder. First, the materials are mixed according to recipe, using computer programs that created the nutrient supply to each proposed building blocks. For example, corn gluten meal has more protein than wheat flour. Since the extruder needs a consistent amount of starch and low moisture to work properly, chemical ingredients – made from meat and bone meal, poultry by-product of higher flour, grain and flour -.

The dough is fed to the screw and extruder. It is exposed to steam and high pressure, because it is forced through dies that determine the shape of the finished product similar to the nozzles used in cake decorating. As the hot, pressurized dough exits the extruder, cut into small pieces, a number of rapidly whirling blades. If the batter reaches the atmospheric pressure, it expands or “blows” in its final form. The food is usually allowed to dry and then digested fats or other compounds to make it more palatable spray. When it has cooled, it can be a bag.

Although cooking kills bacteria in the ingredients, finished goods, pick up more bacteria during the subsequent drying, coating and packaging process. Some experts warn that allowing more bacteria on the surface of wet, dry food, multiply and make pets sick. Do not dry food mixed with water, milk, canned food, or other liquids.

A few dog foods cooked at high temperatures (above 500 ° F) and not pressed. This creates a page of dense, crunchy material, which is then divided into irregular chunks, much like crumbling crackers into soup. It is quite tasty without the sprayed-on fats for energy and other resources required for extruded dry food.

Semi-moist food and treats are produced by many of the PET extruder. To be attractive to consumers and retain their quality, they contain many additives, dyes and preservatives, they are not a good choice of pet food in the first place.

Wet Food

Wet or canned ground ingredients mixed with additives begins. If the pieces are needed, a special extruder forms them. Then the mixture is cooked and canned. Placed in sealed jars and similar containers, pressure cookers and commercial sterilization takes place matters. Some manufacturers cook the right food can be.

Wet foods are quite different in content of dry or semi-moist foods. While many canned products contain a variety, they will be “fresh” and not rendered or processed (although they are often frozen for transport and storage). Wet foods usually contain much more protein and is often a little higher quality than dry food. They also have more moisture, which is better for cats. They are packaged in cans or bags.

Compared to the food categories

Since changes in water content is not directly compare the labels of various kinds of food without a mathematical transition from ‘dry’. Numbers can be very deceptive. For instance, preserves, which include 10% protein is actually a lot more protein than dry food% 30 protein.

That the same food, we first calculate the dry matter content, moisture content, less the label of up to 100%. Then the stock component of the quantity of dry matter. For example, a typical bag of cat food contains 30% protein on the label, but 32% of dry matter (30% dry matter content of 100-6% Moisture = 94%) distributed. Can of cat food may contain 12% protein on the label, but almost 43% of dry matter (12% of its dry matter content, moisture 100-72% = 28%) distributed. Dry food typically contains less than 10% of the water, preserved, and contain 78% or more of water.

Animal protein

Dogs and cats are carnivores, and the best meat-based diet. The protein is used as animal feed derived from different sources. slaughtered cattle, pigs, chickens, sheep or other animals, lean muscle tissue is cut off from the carcase for human consumption, together with the few institutions to eat a man, because the tongue and tripe like.

But not more than 50% of the total animal should not be used for human nutrition. What is the carcass – the head, legs, bones, blood, intestines, lungs, spleens, livers, ligaments, fat trimmings, unborn children, and other parts not normally consumed by humans – is a pet food, animal feed, fertilizer, industrial lubricants, soap, rubber and other products. These “other parts” are known as the “products”. By-products are used as feed for poultry and livestock and pet food.

The nutritional value of by-products, meals, and digests can vary from batch to batch. James Morris and Quinton Rogers of the University of California Davis Veterinary School, argued that “[pet food] ingredients are generally by-products of meat, poultry and fish industry, the nutritional value or the potential for wide variation in nutrient composition. Available suitability of animal feed of the current Association of American feed Control Officials (AAFCO) nutrient balances ( based on the “Profiles”), does not guarantee the adequacy and nutritional ingredients to be analyzed and bioavailability values. “3

Meat or poultry by-products “are very common in wet pet food. Please note that the” meat “refers to only cows, pigs, sheep and goats. Because sheep and goats are rare compared to 37000000 cows and pigs are killed 100 million in food annually to nearly all meat products, cattle and pigs.

A better brand of pet food, how many “super premium”, “natural” and “organic” varieties, do not use by-products. On the label, you’ll see one or more of the meat among the first few ingredients, such as “Turkish” or “sheep.” They are still mainly chicken meat scraps left over from when it comes to home, the bones are allowed, so that “consists primarily of return and the frame spine and ribs, minus their expensive breast meat. A small amount of meat from the bones to the left of the meat for pet food. Even those less attractive source of pet food it is very difficult for marketers when it comes to meat, so it is even heading “Marketing Magic” is described below.

Meat, poultry, by-product meal, meat and bone meal are common ingredients in dry pet food. The term “food” means that these materials are not used fresh, but it had become useless. While the chicken, turkey, poultry by-product meal, and there is no equivalent term for mammal meat by-product meal “- so called” meat and bone meal. “It may be mentioned species, such as” beef and bone meal “or” pork-and-bone meal. ”

What is rendering? As defined in Webster’s Dictionary has to do is, “if the industrial application process: the carcasses of oil and grease, fat-extracted, etc., by melting.” In other words, the raw material is a large bathroom and dumped simmer for several hours. Rendering separates fat and water removed, and kills bacteria, viruses, parasites and other organisms. However, the use of high temperature (270 ° F/130 ° C) may change or destroy the natural enzymes and proteins in the ingredients.

Since the persistent rumors that rendered by-products contain dead dogs and cats, led a study looking for pentobarbital FDA, the most common euthanasia drug, in pet food. They found it. Ingredients that were most frequently related to the presence of pentobarbital were meat-bone meal and animal fat. But they are also very sensitive to DNA tests used for dogs and cats, which were found to follow. Industry insiders acknowledge that pets are thawed and used in animal feed roadkill a few years ago. Although not yet have laws or regulations against the practice is uncommon today, and pet food companies in general, deny that their products contain such substances. But the so-called “4D” animals (dead, dying, diseased, disabled) were only recently banned for human consumption and is still a legitimate ingredients for pet food.

Vegetable protein

The amount of cereal and vegetable products used in pet food has risen over time. Herbal products are now replaced by a large part of the meat, which was first used in commercial pet food. This has serious shortcomings that were corrected by the path that led, but many animals died before the science involved.

Most dry foods contain large amounts of grain or starchy vegetables to give texture. These high-carbohydrate plant products also a cheap source of “energy” – the rest of us call it the “calories.” Gluten meals are high in protein extracts from the most carbohydrates had been removed. They are often used to promote protein shares without the expensive ingredients of animal origin. Corn gluten is the most commonly used for this purpose. Wheat gluten is also used to create shapes like cuts, bites, chunks, shreds, flakes, and windows and a thickener for sauces. In most cases, plant protein foods of poorer quality food.

The current fad, “low-carb” pet food companies have cut off some of the grains and potatoes, peas and other starchy vegetables as substitute. With the exception of animals who are allergic to wheat, the Dry-Low-carb diets, no particular advantage to domestic animals. They also tend to be very high in fat and if fed free choice a result of weight gain. Canned versions are suitable prevention and treatment of diabetic cats, and as part of a weight loss program and maintenance.

Livestock and poultry

This is a unique, pungent odor, a new bag of dry food – What is the source of that smell? Usually this is rendered animal fats, vegetable fats and oils, inedible to humans. Thus, for example, used restaurant grease and tallow in animal feed shall be transmitted for several years, but now a lucrative market for biodiesel production.

These fats sprayed directly pressed pellets, and croquettes, which otherwise would have an unpleasant taste or the product palatable. The fat also acts as a binder, which are producers of other flavor enhancers such as digests “animals” made from processed by-products. Pet food scientists have discovered that animals love the taste of these sprayed fats. Manufacturers championship dog or cat is doing what they usually do not turn the nose to eat.

What happened to the nutrients?

Cooking and other processing of meat products and animal feed can be used to significantly reduce its nutritional value, although cooking increases digestibility of cereal and starchy vegetables.

Nutritious food, pet food manufacturers need to step up “of vitamins and minerals. Why? Because they are together the ingredients are not healthy, their quality can be highly variable, and the harsh manufacturing practices destroy many of the nutrients, the food was to begin.

Proteins are especially prone to heat and become damaged or “denatured,” when cooked. As the dry ingredients twice – Cooked First – if the extruder and re-rendering problems are much more frequent than with canned or homemade food. The changed proteins may be food intolerances, food allergies and inflammatory bowel diseases, including.

Additions of processed pet food

Many chemicals are attached to commercial pet foods, taste, stability, improve the character or appearance of food. Impurities do not give the nutritional value. Additives include emulsifiers to prevent water and fat separation of antioxidants to prevent rancidity of fat and artificial colors and flavors make the product more attractive to consumers and more palatable to your favorite animals.

Various additives and pet food may not be the vitamins and minerals. Not all of them are actually used in pet food. Impurities may be specifically authorized, or they may fall into the category of “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS).

Caking agentsAntigelling agentsAntimicrobial agentsAntioxidantsColor additivesCondimentsCuring agentsDrying agentsEmulsifiersEssential oilsFlavor enhancersFlavoring agentsGrinding agentsHumectantsLeavening agentsLubricantsPalatantsPelleting agent and binder Petroleum derivativespH control agentsPreservativesSeasoningsSpicesStabilizersSweetenersTexturizersThickeners

 

Chemical vs. Natural Preservatives

All commercial pet foods must be kept so that they would be fresh and appealing to our animal companions. Canning is a process of self-preserved, preserved, require little or no additional assistance. Some of the suppliers of raw ingredients or preservatives are, and others can be added by the manufacturer. U. S. Coast Guard calls such as fish meal, Ethoxyquin, or equivalent to gain a strong antioxidant. Of course, produces fish meal spoil such a heat, which led to the ship explosions and fires.

Because manufacturers need to ensure that dry foods are a long shelf life (usually 12 months) for the delivery and storage, fats used in pet foods are eaten, either synthetic or “natural” preservatives have been preserved. Synthetic preservatives include butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), propyl gallate, propylene glycol (also known as a less toxic version of automotive antifreeze) are used, and Ethoxyquin. These antioxidants, there is little information documenting their toxicity, safety, interactions, or chronic use in pet food that you can be every day life in the animal. Propylene glycol was banned in cat food because it causes anemia in cats, but it is still allowed to dog food.

Potentially carcinogenic substances such as BHA, BHT and Ethoxyquin are permitted at relatively low levels. Use of these chemicals in pet foods has not been studied thoroughly, and may ultimately prove to be detrimental to long-term development of their agents. By preliminary data, the study questioned the safety of Ethoxyquin, Monsanto, the manufacturer, it was necessary to carry out new, more rigorous study. It was completed in the 1996th Even though Monsanto found no significant toxicity of their product the FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine in July 1997 that manufacturers voluntarily reduce by half the limit of Ethoxyquin, 75 parts per million. Although some critics believe the pet food and veterinary surgeons that Ethoxyquin is the main cause illness, skin problems and infertility in dogs, others claim it is the safest, strongest, most stable preservative in pet food. Ethoxyquin is approved for use in food protection, such as spices, chili powder, cayenne, and at 100 ppm – but it would be very difficult to consume even the most hard-core Spice lovers too much like chili powder, such as daily dog eat dry food. Ethoxyquin has never been tested for safety in cats. However, it is commonly used for veterinary diet for dogs and cats.

Many pet food makers have responded to consumer concern, is now using “natural” preservatives such as Vitamin C (ascorbic acid), vitamin E (mixed tocopherols), and oils of rosemary, cloves or other spices, fats and their actual products. Shelf life is shorter, but – only about six months.

Individual ingredients, such as fish meal, preservatives may be added before they reach the food manufacturers. Federal law requires preservatives to the fat declared on the label, however, pet food companies do not always comply with this law.

Accessories

Given the nature of things manufacturers put in pet food, it is not surprising that bad things happen sometimes. Ingredients in pet foods are often heavily contaminated with various toxic substances. Some of them are destroyed in processing, but not in others.

Pet Food Recalls

If things go really wrong and serious problems are found in pet food company usually works with the FDA recalled the affected products in line with it. Although many have pointed out extensively, very few are not.

Diet-related diseases

The idea is necessary that we all have a companion animal nutrition and pet food for your whole life for, is a dangerous myth.

Today, eating dogs and cats far from the variable meat-based diets that their ancestors ate. Unpleasant consequences are based on processed corn, spread on a diet. Health problems related to nutrition:

Many nutritional problems appeared popular cereal commercial pet food. Some have occurred because the diet was deficient. Although several ingredients are now supplemented, we do not know what ingredients future researchers may happen that pet food should be added all the time. Other problems may arise from the reaction of additives. Others are due to contamination with bacteria, mold, drugs or other poisons. In some diseases the role of commercial pet food to understand the policy, others are not. The bottom line is that the diet is mostly low-quality cereals and rendered meals are not as composed as nutritious or safe to have their cat or dog.

Co-Packing

2007 Menu Foods recall, he brought some of the pet food industry, dirtiest secrets to the light.

Most people were surprised – and shocked – to find that all the Iams / Eukanuba Canned Iams Company is not done. In fact, in 2003, Iams’s exclusive 10-year contract for the production of 100% of its canned by Menu.

This type of transaction is a “co-packing.” One company makes the food, which leads him to someone else’s plate. This is a very common arrangement for the pet food industry. It was first pointed out Doane and Diamond, including the dozens of private labels were represented. But do not be so large or so “serious”, such as Iams, Eukanuba, Hill’s was, Purina, Nutro, and other high-end, the so-called “premium” foods.

The big question raised by this agreement or not, whether there is any real difference between the least expensive brands and generics. Recalled products contain the active ingredient containing suspect wheat gluten, but not all of any by-products, including specific products, such as liver or giblets.

It is true that the pet food company can offer contracts for co-packer of its ingredients, or it may require the contractor to purchase certain components used in your recipes. But part of the attraction is with a co-packer that she could buy ingredients in bulk, larger than any of the pet food manufacturer of its own, making the process cheaper and more profitable. It is likely that many of the ingredients in all types of pet food section, which has the same composition.

Is one company’s products – the same ingredients in the same machine with the same name is called – is actually “better” than others? It is expensive to make players want to believe. Recalled brands claim that their food menu according to your recipe ingredients, as I have said, “and that” the manufacturers must meet stringent quality requirements. ” In fact, contracts are necessarily those points. But in the real world, things are not planned. How well the machines are cleaned between batches, as minimum wage workers, and thoroughly mix in particular is a dirty stinking job and everything would be perfect?

What are the differences between low cost and high-end food, one thing is clear. The purchase price of pet food is not always the pet food is good or bad, or even safe. But the very cheapest food in a very inexpensive ingredients. For example, Ol ‘Roy, Wal-Mart to maintain the brand, and is now involved in three major points.

Menu Foods manufactures many companies, not the market, including Nature’s Variety, Wellness, Castor and Pollux, Newman’s Own Organics, Wysong, Innova and Eagle Pack canned were affected. It is simple in its list of ingredients that these products are made from completely different ingredients and proportions, to see done. Here the problem of cleaning a machine between batches up, but hopefully not something that is deadly to move food to another.

Animal tests

Another bad practice with this recall is pet food testing on live animals. Menu’s own experiments in animals that have been deliberately fed rotten food, were the first known victims. The tests began in the 27th February (one week after the first reports) animals began dying in great pain, and kidney failure a few days later. shortly after the first press the menu has changed his story about the experiments’ taste to call. ” But the menu, live feeding, energy metabolism, taste tests and other Iams and other companies for years. Video tapes showing the animals living in barren metal cages; callous treatment, invasive tests and reckless cruelty.

While feeding trials can not be used for food labeling requirements for food “complete and balanced,” Many livestock producers to meet the palatability of the development of a new pet food research is needed. The number of animals is fed a new diet, while the “control” group is fed with the current formula. Total volume eaten is used gauge of palatability of food. Some companies use feeding trials, which are much more precise assessment of the actual nutritional value of foods. They keep large colonies of dogs and cats, or use the laboratories in order to have their animals.

There is a movement towards the palatability of pet animals into their homes, and other studies. In 2006, the Iams Company has cut the use of dogs and cats, laboratory animals by 70%. Although he said the moral victory, it is actually likely to be a financial possibility. Whatever the reason, it is a very positive step in the animals.

Finally, it is important to remember that the pollution, which could be held back to Menu Foods could happen anywhere at any time. It was not a mistake menu toxin was unusual and unexpected. All companies have quality control standards and test the ingredients of the common toxins before they are used. In addition to testing the finished products. However, the baseline risk is the use of raw materials that go to the pet food. If there are 11 to 12 years will be remembered, it is clear that the “freak events” are the rule rather than the exception.

Marketing Magic

Trip to the pet food aisle will waver in mind all the wonderful claims of pet food makers to its repertoire of products. Knowledge of the nature of the ingredients will help sort out some of the outrageous claims, but what is the truth behind all the hype?

Pet Food Marketing and advertising has become highly sophisticated in recent years. It is important to know what is hype and what is realistic to make decisions about what to feed your pet an informed decision.

Since the pet food manufacturers frequently change the recipes for their products and Born Free USA would not have the necessary tests, we are unable to offer endorsements for particular brands of pet food. Many of our employees choose to buy your pet food or a natural or organic products, most of the food and specialty stores, but we can not recommend brands, would be entitled to have their companion animal or animals.

PET is the UK’s largest independent supermarket ® online pet store with wonderful service, and in addition they can save up to 70% discount on your pet food and accessories in our store, you should not miss the unique Daily offers and exclusive promotions.

 

PET ® supermarket you can buy online, and select the delivery date the time that suits. You also have the opportunity to deliver if you spend over £ 29 and our service. We guarantee that all products are made of PET ® is a supermarket to buy not only the promise to adjust our prices, but also a 100% satisfaction guarantee to our 28-day satisfaction guarantee with no questions back, so you can shop pet supermarket ®.

 

We are so confident that we offer the best service of any online company, we offer a unique 5 * UK PET warranty as to why we are the UK pet shop in PET. Many seek to imitate our warranties and claims to be the best or the biggest favorites, but do not settle for poor imitations.

 

PET supermarket ® 5 * Warranty * Guaranteed delivery * Lowest price, if it * is * a 28-day no quibble Returns * expert advice at the right time or the delivery of your supplies for free!

 

During a recent survey found more than 1629 users to our website in order to

98th Would you recommend us to 65%

95th 83% are either very likely or likely to use us in the future 89th 76% were either very satisfied or satisfied with the time taken to make their bookings in the 81st 66% were either very satisfied or satisfied with our prices compared to other pet dealers 91st 2% were either very satisfied or satisfied with our products

 

Supermarket PET ® customers can shop online with us added confidence that we will approve the plan for safe Internet shopping. .

 

 


Feed dealers

Reasons to buy organic food

Category : feed additives

Organic food is the food of animals and plants that were bred and raised in accordance with strict guidelines relating to the Government’s definition of “organic origin.” Certified as organic food, prepared food must be grown without the use of products such as fertilizers, man-made pesticides, additives that control or modify growth, antibodies, and / or animal feed and food additives. Hand feeding than just a niche was not so long ago that “eating organic” was something that only a relatively small number of people. Back in the 1960s was changing lives. Women started working outside the home and the convenience trend at that time. Processed food means good meal on the table to deliver a fraction of time. The market for frozen and processed foods literally took. Organic food was definitely not something that most people gave much attention, because it does not have enough time to visit the butcher, dairy products and suppliers. Could now be a family trip to a supermarket, where there is enough food for several days. And that’s how life continued, driven by the need for speed and convenience. Go Organic MainstreamLately, people’s feelings towards the foods they will eat again. This time, nourished by a sense that people do not know what they impose on their bodies. News stories today E. coli outbreaks, genetic food engineering complete, the potential dangers of eating foods that are shot with growth hormones, that they are bigger and better, and bad information to others. get tired of feeling out of control, eating organic has become chic and the latest trend is definitely eating among people from all strata in society. True organic food is more expensive than non-organic food, but compromises are worth the extra expense. Not only is organic food better for those who consume them to tell people who eat organic foods taste better than they really are foods grown and raised without this strict definition. In fact, organic food is the best way is really the only way to be 100% sure of foods consumed. Meet new demand for organic food is big business today, and constantly growing segment of the food industry. Farmers will change the way they grow their food to the increased demand grows. Unfortunately, the produce growers, it may take up to two full years for the country to synthetic pesticides and fertilizers that were applied to all years prior to the growing environment clean. But wait, it is interesting as a compromise. Organic food is so popular that it is no longer necessary to shop in stores. In fact, large grocery chains are constantly devoting more shelf space needs of the ever-growing needs of organic food trailer.


Feed dealers

Reasons to purchase organic food

Category : feed additives

Organic food is the food of animals and plants that were bred and raised in accordance with strict guidelines, which are linked to the government definition of “organic origin.” Certified as organic food, prepared food must be grown without the use of products such as fertilizers, which are man-made pesticides, additives to control or modify growth, antibodies, and / or animal feed additives, and. Hand feeding than just a niche was not so long ago that “eating organic” was something that only a relatively small number of people. Back in the 1960s was changing lives. Women started working outside the home and the convenience trend at that time. Processed food means good meals can be delivered in a fraction of the board. The market for frozen and processed foods literally took. Organic food was definitely not something that most people gave much attention, because it does not have enough time to visit the butcher, dairy products and suppliers. Was now a family trip to a supermarket, where there is enough food for several days. And that’s how life continued, driven by the need for speed and convenience. Go Organic MainstreamLately, people’s feelings towards the foods they will eat again. This time, fed by a sense that people do not know what they put into their bodies. News stories today E. coli outbreaks, genetic food engineering complete, the potential dangers of eating foods that are shot with growth hormones, that they are bigger and better, and other information of concern. get tired of feeling out of control, eating organic has become chic and the latest trend is definitely eating among people from all strata in society. True organic food is more expensive than non-organic food, but compromises are worth the additional costs. Not only is organic food better for those who consume them said that people who eat these foods to organic foods taste better than the real ones, and to increase without a narrow definition. In fact, organic food is the best way is really the only way to be 100% sure of foods consumed. Meet new demand for organic food is big business today, and constantly growing segment of the food industry. Farmers will change the way they grow their food to the increased demand grows. Unfortunately, the produce growers, it may take up to two full years for the country to synthetic pesticides or fertilizers that were applied to all years prior to the growing environment clean. But wait, it is interesting as a compromise. Organic food is so popular that it is no longer necessary to shop in stores. In fact, large grocery chains are constantly devoting more shelf space needs of an ever growing needs of organic food trailer.


Feed dealers

What is organic food, and should I buy?

Category : feed additives

Organic food is the food of animals and plants that were bred and raised in accordance with strict guidelines relating to the Government’s definition of “organic origin.” Certified as organic food, prepared food must be grown without the use of products such as fertilizers, which are man-made pesticides, additives that control or modify growth, antibodies, and / or animal feed and food additives.

Foods once only a niche market

It was not so long ago that eating “organic” was something that only a relatively small number of people. Back in the 1960s was changing lives. Women started working outside the home and the convenience trend at that time. Processed food means good meal on the table to deliver a fraction of time. The market for frozen and processed foods literally took.

Organic food was definitely not something that most people gave much attention, because it does not have enough time to see the butcher, dairy products and suppliers. Could now be a family trip to a supermarket, where there is enough food for several days. And that’s how life continued, driven by the need for speed and convenience.

Go Organic Food Mainstream

More recently, eating people’s feelings towards the foods they will again. This time, nourished by a sense that people do not know what they impose on their bodies. News stories today E. coli outbreaks, genetic food engineering complete, the potential dangers of eating foods that are shot with growth hormones, that they are bigger and better, and bad information to others. get tired of feeling out of control, eating organic has become chic and the latest trend is definitely eating among people from all strata in society.

True organic food is more expensive than non-organic food, but compromises are worth the extra expense. Not only is organic food better for those who consume them to tell people who eat organic foods taste better than they really are foods grown and raised without this strict definition. In fact, organic food is the best way is really the only way to be 100% sure of foods consumed.

Meet new demand

Today, organic food is big business and an ever-growing share of the food industry. Farmers will change the way they grow them to an increased demand for food grows. Unfortunately, the produce growers, it may take up to two full years for the country to the synthetic pesticides and fertilizers that were applied to all years prior to the growing environment clean. But wait, it is interesting as a compromise.

Organic food is so popular that it is no longer necessary to shop in stores. In fact, large grocery chains are constantly devoting more shelf space needs of the ever-growing needs of organic food trailer.


Feed dealers

The Reasons For Buying Organic Food

Category : feed additives

Organic food is the food derived from animals and plants that have been grown and raised in accordance with the strict guidelines associated with government’s definition of the term, “organic. ” In order to be certified as an organic food, food must be grown without the use of products such as manufactured fertilizers, synthetic or man-made pesticides, additives that control or modify growth, antibodies, and/or and livestock feed containing additives. Organic Foods Once Just a Niche MarketIt wasn’t that long ago that “eating organic” was something only a relatively small number of people did. Back in the 1960’s, life was changing. Women were beginning to work outside the home and the trend then was convenience. Processed foods meant a good meal could be delivered to the table in a fraction of the time. The market for frozen and processed foods literally took off. Organic food was definitely not something that most people gave much attention to especially since there no longer was enough time to visit the butcher, the produce vendor and the dairy farm. A quick trip to the supermarket could now provide a family with enough food for several days. And that’s how life continued, fueled by the need for speed and convenience. Organic Foods Go MainstreamLately, people’s feelings towards the foods they eat are changing once again. This time, the change is being fueled by the feeling that people no longer know what they’re putting into their bodies. The news today is filled with stories of E. coli outbreaks, genetic food engineering, the potential dangers of eating foods that are shot up with growth hormones to make them bigger and better, and other frightening information. Tired of feeling out of control, eating organic has become chic and has definitely become the latest trend in eating among people from all levels of society. True organic food is more expensive than non-organic food, but the trade-offs are well worth the additional cost. Not only is organic food better for those who consume it, the people who eat organic foods claim these foods actually taste better than those grown and raised without this strict definition. In fact, eating organic is the best way and really is the only way to feel 100% confident about the foods that are consumed. Meeting the New DemandToday, organic food is big business and an ever-growing segment of the food industry. Farmers are changing the way they grow their foods to take advantage of this increased demand. Unfortunately for produce growers, it can take up to 2 full years for the land to cleanse itself of the synthetic pesticides and fertilizers that have been applied during all the years prior to growing organic. But the wait is a worthwhile trade-off as well. Organic foods are so popular that it’s no longer necessary to shop for them at specialty stores. In fact, large grocery store chains are constantly devoting more shelf space to meet the ever-growing needs of organic food devotees.


Feed dealers

Choosing the Best Dog Food

Category : feed additives

Browse any grocery store or pet food store to buy Dog Food and you will agree that trying to decide on what is best for your dog is an exhausting task. Scanning the shelves of products available, you are bombarded by foods extolling different health benefits as well as a huge range of prices. The pet food industry is a multi-billion dollar industry and pet food manufacturers are eagerly marketing for every dollar. Not only are they marketing us to death, but also developing new products to put in front of us. Those products include “dry”, “canned”, “semi-moist” and health targeted products such as “senior”, “premium” and “gourmet.
So which food is best for your dog? Finding that out takes time and research. The truth is, the best dog food is the one that meets your dog’s nutritional requirements, which vary based upon the dog’s age, breed, body weight, genetics, and amount of activity. . . and one that fits within your budget. It is definitely worth consulting a veterinarian to get the best advice and nutrition plan for your dog. But for those of you that want to take matters in your own hands, you will find detailed below the most important things you will need to know.
Dog Food Labels
Susan Powter comes to mind when thinking about food labels. Remember this iconic infomercial star with the coined phrase “Stop the Insanity”? Her gospel about nutrition and the importance of studying the ingredients on the side of the packaging to distinguish the various elements and how each plays its role in overall nutrition, was novel at that time. It seems that this was the beginning of the mass movement to better nutrition, label reading and choosing products more carefully.
With all the recent pet food recalls, millions of dog owners have extended this scrutiny to selecting a dog food. But we can’t pull from the Susan Powter gospel for this, because dog foods are manufactured under a series of different standards and regulations, put forth by the AAFCO ( The Association of American Feed Control Officials ). There are special labeling requirements that require all dog foods to have certain information on the label. So, in order that we can all make a proper choice for our dogs, we must know how to read and understand the dog food label.
The AAFCO puts out an official publication, on a yearly basis, detailing special requirements for dog food. Among all the different requirements, they request all dog food manufacturers to adhere to label regulations and must include on the package the following:
# Product Name
# Guaranteed Analysis
# Nutritional Adequacy Statement
# Feeding Directions
The Name Game
When shopping for dog food, what is the first thing you look at? The product name, of course. We’ve all walked down the pet food aisle and seen the product names jump out as us. . . calling us. Displayed in bold type and fancy fonts such descriptions as “With Chicken”, “All Life Stages”, “Duck Entree”, “95% Beef”, “Natural Dog Food”. But what do these descriptions really mean? Is it just fancy marketing? The AAFCO has set forth rules that dictate how ingredients can be used in a product name.
95% Rule
# Applies to most canned dog food that consists mostly of meat, poultry or fish.
# Specifies that at least 95% of the dog food must be the named ingredient on the label, not counting water and preservatives added for processing.
# Counting water, the product must still consist of 70% of the product.
# If the name consists of a combination of ingredients, the two combined must equal 95%.
# The rule only applies to ingredients of animal origin, so grains and vegetables cannot be used as part of the 95% rule. So if the product name was “Beef and Brown Rice”, the product would still have to consist of 95% beef.
25% or “Dinner” Rule
# This rule applies to many canned as well as dry dog foods.
# If the named ingredient, or a combination of ingredients, found on the label consists of 25% of the weight (but less than 95%) excluding water for sufficient processing.
# The name must include a descriptive term, such as “Dinner”, “Platter”, “Entree”, or “Formula”.
# If more than one ingredient is in the name, they must both total 25% combined, with each named ingredient equalling or exceeding 3%.
3% or “With” Rule
# Originally, this rule was intended to apply only to ingredients highlighted on the package, outside of the product name.
# It allows manufacturers to highlight minor ingredients.
# The ingredient must have at least 3% added.
# The rule now allows manufacturers to use the term “With” in the product name.
Be careful when reading the dog food label because “Beef Dog Food” and “Dog Food with Beef” are not the same. The first must have 95% beef, whereas the latter only needs 3%.
Flavor Rule
# A percentage of any one ingredient isn’t required.
# The word “Flavor” must appear on the label in the same font size and color as the ingredient name.
# The flavor might be the corresponding ingredient, but more often than not, it’s another substance such as “meal”, “by-product”, a “stock” or a “broth”.
Guaranteed Analysis
The guaranteed analysis is the next component that needs to be on a dog food label. It serves as a general guide as to what the percentages of the main nutrients and other items are in the total makeup of the product. At the bare minimum, the guaranteed analysis must consist of the following:
# Minimum Percentage of Protein
# Minimum Percentage of Fat
# Maximum Percentage of Fiber
# Maximum Percentage of Moisture
Go ahead and look at your label at this point. See it there? Good. Now, if you have a can of dog food and a package of dry dog food at your disposal, take a look at both labels. After careful analysis you might want to ask, “Hey Michael, I notice when looking at both labels that the dry dog food has way more nutrients. I thought canned food had way more protein. . . what gives?”
Keep this in mind, as I have noticed this as well, that the amounts of protein and other nutrients stated on the labels appear to be less for canned versus dry, but looks are deceiving. The reason? Differences in moisture content. Canned dog food, on average, consists of 75% water, while dry dog food contains about 10%. So to make a true comparison of the nutrient levels, we need to put both types on the same playing field. To do this, we will be converting both products to dry matter.
To convert the nutrients, we need to dust off our calculators that we last used in high school, in order to perform a little math. (And you said to your math teacher, “I’ll never use this in the real world!”), But I digress. Here’s the formula we will be using: % Guarantee divided by % Dry Matter multiplied by 100
Example In one corner, we have a canned dog food that has a guaranteed analysis consisting of 9% protein, 6% fat, 1. 5% fiber and 78% moisture. In the other corner, we have a dry dog food that has a guaranteed analysis consisting of 24% protein, 14. 5% fat, 4% fiber and 10% moisture.
# Dry matter of canned: 100 – 78 = 22
# Dry matter of dry: 100 – 10 = 90
# Now we can do our calculations
Canned Dog Food
# Protein: 9 / 22 x 100 = 40. 9%
# Fat: 6 / 22 x 100 = 27%
# Fiber: 1. 5 / 22 x 100 = 6. 8%
Dry Dog Food
# Protein: 24 / 90 x 100 = 26. 6%
# Fat: 14. 5 / 90 x 100 = 16. 1%
# Fiber: 4 / 90 x 100 = 4. 4%
So after were done, do you notice the protein? The canned dog food actually has 14% more protein.
Nutritional Adequacy Statement
You’ve seen it on the labels. . . “Complete”, “Balanced”, “For All Lifestages”, among others. But how are these claims substantiated? What rules are in place to regulate such verbage? The answer is set forth, once again, by the AAFCO.
The Nutritional Adequacy Statement is required and is one of the most important aspects of a dog food label. This statement assures us that a product meets all of a dog’s nutritional requirements. So how is a dog food substantiated for nutritional adequacy? They must use one of two ways:
Calculations
# The method whereby the dog food contains ingredients formulated to provide levels of nutrients that meet an established profile
# Calculations estimate the amount of nutrients either by an average nutrient content of ingredients or results of laboratory tests using standard chemical analysis.
# If it meets the profile set by the AAFCO, the label will carry a statement as follows: “(Name of product) is formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO (Dog) Food Nutrient Profiles for (specific life stage). ”
Feeding Trials
# The product (or a similar product made by the same company) has been tested in dogs under strict guidelines and found to provide proper nutrition
# If it meets the profile set by the AAFCO, the label will carry a statement as follows: “Animal feeding tests using AAFCO procedures substantiate that (name of product) provides complete and balanced nutrition for (specific life stage). ”
The Nutritional Adequacy Statement will also include a statement about which life stage(s) the dog food is suitable for. Two profiles are used. Below is a definition of each and additional information about other profiles:
# Growth/Lactation – A product intended for growing puppies, for pregnant dogs or lactating females.
# Maintenance – Suitable for any adult, non-reproducing dog of normal activity level, but may not be sufficient for a growing, reproducing, or hard working dog.
# Terms like “Senior” or “Formulated for Large Breed Adults” means the dog food meets the requirements for the Maintenance profile, but nothing more.
# A product that doesn’t fit within the two profiles above must state that “This product is intended for intermittent or supplemental feeding,” except if it is conspicuously identified as a snack or treat.
Feeding Guidelines
Feeding guidelines are very broad, to say the least. At a minimum, they should include instruction like “Feed ___ Cups Per ___ Pounds. ” But keep in mind that these instructions are very rough estimates. Most people feed their dogs way too much. In fact, 25% of all dog’s are overweight. . . causing problems such as:
# Diabetes
# Arthritis
# Heart and Liver Problems
# Bladder Cancer
You should treat the guidelines as a place to start. Talk with your veterinarian about your dog food and how much to feed. They understand that nutritional requirements vary and, by knowing your dog, they will be able to recommend a feeding schedule based upon several factors including:
# Age
# Body Weight
# Breed
# Genetics
# Activity Level


Feed dealers

Best of the Best Dog Food

Category : feed additives

Browse all of the grocery store or pet food store to buy dog food and you will agree with me that the test to decide what is best for your dog is a tiring task. Scanning shelves of products available, you are bombarded by foods extolling different health benefits as well as many of the prices. Pet food industry is a multi-billion dollar industry and pet food manufacturers eager for each marketing dollar. Not only are they marketing us to death, but also for new products to put before us. These products are “dry”, “boxes”, “semi-moist” and health targeted products such as “seniors”, “Premium” and “Gourmet. So it is best food for your dog? Do you think the time has come, and research. The truth is, is one of the best dog food that your dog’s nutritional needs, which vary depending on the dogs age, race, weight, genetics and activity level is equivalent. . . and the one that suits your budget. It is definitely worth consulting a veterinarian, the best advice and nutrition plan for your dog. But for those who want to take up the service, here are the most important things you need to know, can be found in detail. Dog Food labels Susan Powter comes to mind when it comes to food labels. Remember this iconic infomercial star, the words “Stop coined madness”? Her gospel about nutrition and the importance to investigate the ingredients side of the packaging to distinguish the different elements and how nutrition plays a role in the overall strategy for a new back then. It seems that this was the beginning of a mass movement to better nutrition, label reading and choosing products more carefully. For all the latest pet food recalls of millions of dog owners has been extended to this range of control dog food. But we can not from the Susan Powter gospel for this train, because the food is produced in a number of different standards and regulations that are furthest from the AAFCO (Association of American feed control officials). There are special labeling requirements that all food available for dogs to certain information on the label. Alright, we all have the right choice for our dogs, we must know how to read and understand the dog food label. AAFCO is an official publication of each year, specifying the specific requirements for dog food. Of all the different requirements, they will require to comply with all the dog food packaging manufacturer, and containing elements of the label must include the following information: Product # # Guaranteed Analysis Nutritional suitability Statement # # Feeding Directions Name Game When shopping for dog food, which is the first thing to get around? Product name, of course. We have all walked the walk and pet products, as seen jumping out of our own. . . calls us. Bold, and fancy fonts such descriptions as “chicken”, “all life stages”, “Duck Entrée”, “95% of beef”, “Natural Dog Food”. But what do these descriptions really? Is it just fancy marketing? AAFCO has created rules which require how these ingredients can be used in the product name. 95% rule # Applies to most canned dog food, mainly meat, poultry or fish. # Specifies that at least 95% of the dog food label ingredients, excluding water and is treated with preservatives. # Counting water, the product must still consist of 70% of the product. # If the name is a combination of ingredients, the two together is 95% identical. # The rule only applies to ingredients of animal origin, so grains and vegetables can not be used as part of the 95% rule. So, if the product was “Beef and Brown Rice” is still produced 95% of beef. 25% or “Dinner” Rule # This rule applies to many canned and dry dog food. # If the above ingredients or combination of ingredients on the label consists of 25% or more (but less than 95%) without adequate water treatment. # You must have a descriptive term such as “Dinner,” “platter,” Entrée “or the” formula “. # If more than one ingredient is in the name, they are both connected to a total of 25%, each component is equal to or greater than 3%. 3% or “‘Rule # Originally, this procedure must contain only ingredients that are outside of the packaging of the product name. # It allows manufacturers to tag the smaller parts. # The active substance shall be not less than 3% added. # The rule now allows manufacturers the concept of “together”, as used in the product name. Be careful reading of the dog food label because “Beef Dog Food” and “Dog Food with Beef” are not the same. The first 95% must be beef, but the second requires only 3%. Flavor of Article # Percentage of ingredients is not required. # The word “flavor” on the label must be the same font and color will appear in the ingredient name. # Flavor of the ingredient may be relevant, but more often than not, it is another substance, such as “Theme”, “product”, “stock” or “broth”. Guaranteed Analysis Guaranteed Analysis is the next component to be a dog food label. It acts as a general guide, which is part of the key nutrients and other elements of the total composition. An absolute minimum, ensuring the analysis must consist of the following: # Minimum Percentage of Protein # Minimum Fat Maximum # of fiber # The maximum percentage of moisture Come and see the label at this point. See this? Very good. Well, if you pack dog food and dry dog food Here is a look at the two labels. After careful analysis, you might ask, “Hey Michael, I noticed that both labels that the dry dog food has more nutrients. I was canning, more protein … what happened?” Remember, if I have not noticed that the protein and other nutrients on the label seem less appropriate as compared to doses of dry, but looks are deceiving. Why? Differences in moisture content. Dog food, on average, are 75% water, while the dog food contains about 10%. So to make a correct comparison of nutrients, we have both taken the same playing field. To this end, we will not change as the dry matter. To convert the nutrients we need to dust off our computers that we use as a secondary school to do a little math. (And did you say your math teacher: “I have never used them in the real world!”), But I digress. Here is the formula we are using:% Guarantee divided by the dry weight multiplied by 100% For example, in one corner we have a dog food that is guaranteed analysis consisting of 9% protein, 6% fat, 1 5% glass and 78% humidity. In another corner, we have a dog food that guaranteed analysis consisting of 24% protein, 14 have. 5% fat, 4% fiber and 10% humidity. # Preserved by dry weight: 100-78 = 22 # Dry matter of dry: 100-10 = 90 # Now we can do our calculations Dog Food # Protein: 22.9 x 100 = 40 9% # Fat: 22.6 x 100 = 27% # Fiber: 1 6 8 x 100 = 22.5% Dog Food # Protein: 24/90 x 100 = 26th 6% # Fat: 14 5 / 90 x 1 100 = 16% # Fiber: 4 / 90 4 x 100 = 4% So after that, ready when you get protein? Canned dog food actually 14% more protein. Nutrition Physiology fitness Statement You have to see it on labels. . . ‘Full’, ‘balanced’, ‘Life For All Day “, among others. But how are these claims justified? What rules are in place to regulate such verbage? The answer is fixed, the AAFCO again. Nutritional adequacy statement is needed, and is one of the most important aspects of a dog food label. This statement confirms to us that the product meets all the nutritional requirements of dogs. So, what is a reasonable nutrition and nutritional adequacy? You need one of two ways: Calculations # Method is formulated at the level of nutrients in dog food ingredients, including the offer to comply with the profile # It is believed that the average amount of nutrients on the nutrient content of ingredients or results of laboratory tests using standard chemical analysis. # If it meets the AAFCO profiles set out the conditions for the label statement is as follows: “(name of product) is formulated to meet the nutritional value of the fixed planes AAFCO (Dog), the nutrient profiles of foods (in certain stages of life).” Feeding experiments # Product (or a similar product made from the same company) has been tested in dogs with strict guidelines and to ensure proper nutrition # If it meets the requirements of the profile established by AAFCO, the label’s statement resulted as follows: “if AAFCO feed tests show that the (product name) gives a complete and balanced nutrition for (specific life stage). Nutritional adequacy statement is a declaration of life in the platform (s) is suitable for dog food. Two profiles are used. Below is a definition of each and additional information on other profiles: # Growth / Lactation – which is a product designed for growing puppies, pregnant or lactating women as dogs. # Support – suitable for all adult dogs of normal activity is not repeating, but possibly not growing, reproducing, or hard working dog enough. # Terms like “Senior” or “Formulated for Large Breed Adults” means the dog food meets the requirements of maintenance of the profile, but no more. # This product, which is not attached to the two profiles must satisfy in order to “This product is intended for intermittent or supplemental feeding,” except where it is conspicuously identified as a snack or treatment. Feeding Guidelines Feeding guidelines are very broad, to say the least. At least they should give the song such as “feed ___ cups per ___ pounds.” However, keep in mind that these instructions are very rough estimates. Most people feed their dogs too much. In fact, 25% of all dogs are overweight. . . Cause problems such as: Diabetes # # Arthritis # Heart and liver disease # Bladder You should treat the guidelines for the place to start. Talk to your veterinarian about your dog as much food and feed. They understand that nutritional needs are different, and knowing your dog, feeding schedule, they may depend on several factors, including the proposed basis: Age # # Weight # Breed # Genetics # Activity Level


Feed dealers

Of growth hormones in food

Category : feed additives

Meat and milk-based products in many Western diets. In fact, the public perception that some of the meat and two glasses of milk every day, good bone and muscle mass guaranteed. However, many people are not aware of what is in milk cartons, they can Supermarket cuts of beef they grill or barbecue. Ugly fact, dairy products and meat (especially beef) production is that many of the major manufacturers are well-growth hormones to increase production. This is not a new issue, bovine growth hormone used to increase U.S. beef and milk production was oriented to the debate for some time. But although a growing number of consumers and scientists its concern for human health risk is a practice by the USDA and the FDA has approved the use of six hormones for growth promotants (HGPs) in growing cattle, and other hormones to increase milk production. Few other countries have pledged to use HGPs, while many others have banned their use. The dispute surrounded the fact that there are no labeling requirements for the U.S. growth hormones in food. A recent study provides strong arguments against the importance of environmental cattle injections are a new twist, the debate was. Hormone in the debate revolves around four key questions: who is centered in the growth hormones, animal health and welfare, food safety and environmental concerns. History of artificial growth hormones in milk, or bovine growth hormone BST is a natural hormone secreted by the pituitary gland of cows. Traces of the BST hormone excreted in the milk was injected into the animal. BST is also known poularly Bundesgerichtshof, or bovine growth hormone. It interacts with other hormones in cows’ bodies to verify the amount of milk they produce. Scientists are working with Monsanto, the agricultural giant, developed genetically engineered a synthetic version of a hormone recombinant bovine growth hormone, or rBGH, that milk production increased 10% to 25%. Confirmed U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1993, it was offered to compensate farmers for next year. By 2008, one-third of American dairy cows with rBGH is injected. Growth hormones in beef, U.S. beef cattle industry began to increase in the production of hormones in the 1956th They used DES (diethylstilbestrol) – which cattle were allowed to use the 1954th 1970 certified U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the six hormones for growth promotants (HGPs). These include three naturally occurring hormones – estradiol, progesterone and testosterone – and three synthetic hormones – zeranol, trenbolone and melengestrol. Growth hormones in veal to the U.S. beef production in 2004 was convicted guilty of injecting 90% of calves with growth hormones. These hormones include all six HGPs is not approved for use in adult cattle, therefore, focuses on the safety or side effects of hormone injections the calves for heifers and steers over 700 lbs, that was never investigated. It is believed that these hormones, in contrast, a young calf of the body to be metabolized, resulting in a large number of hormones that people who eat beef could be eaten. Which countries allow growth hormones? Milk – The use of growth hormones to increase milk production is permitted in the U.S.. However, it is not for sale in Canada or the European Union (EU) certified. Beef – the use of hormones as growth promoters in cattle is an issue that has stirred much debate in the world. They are intended for use in Canada and the United States. However, the use of hormones as growth promoters is banned in the EU. As the use of growth hormones? Milk – Dairy cows have been injected with rBGH to increase their breast-feeding. It acts as a hormone with other hormones in cows’ bodies, the amount of milk they produce growth. Beef – U. S. Food and Drug Administration approved six hormones for growth promotants (HGPs), including the three naturally occurring hormones – estradiol, progesterone and testosterone – and three synthetically produced hoemones – zeranol, trenbolone and melengestrol. They are implanted or injected into cattle in different stages of maturity. FDA does not allow injection of calves in these hormones. The male hormone testosterone and its synthetic equivalent trenbolone and the female hormone progesterone including three synthetic derivatives zeranol, 17 beta-estradiol and melengestrol acetate (MGA) is either implanted or injected into the cows. Melengestrol is additive and not injected, but he added that the raw materials. Hormones are also said to improve the nutritional intake of their animals. This means the animal must reach the surface of the mass source (mass market). Hormones contribute to the quality of meat produced by changing the deposition of fat, lean meat, consumers want to improve it. How growth hormone to increase milk production – Experts say that there are two obvious advantages of the widespread use of rBGH:

However, it has been argued that the U.S. no longer need milk. produced could eat It is said that ever since l950s, America’s dairies consistently more milk than the nation, the federal government buys surplus each year to prevent the descent of the price. Beef – Beef cattle producers to inject growth hormones because they:

Canadian Animal Health Institute found that the use of growth hormones, the benefits to both producers and consumers.

Animal health and welfare of the hormone rBGH milk producing animals are treated with hormones opened a huge load. 12 weeks after calving, a cow produces milk. In the process, the cow loses weight, is infertile and are susceptible to disease. As the yield decreases, the cow will back to the body. By injecting cows with rBGH, a farmer of this milching extends eight to 12 weeks. Even if the hormone injections a significant increase in dairy production, they also make more susceptible to disease. U. S. Food and Drug Agency (FDA) will require Monsanto labels for each shipment of Posilac (the name of the hormone rBGH), 21 health problems in the use of the hormone. These include cystic ovaries, uterine disorders, decreased length of gestation and birth weight of calves, increased twinning rates and retained placenta. Hormone injected cows are prone to mastitis – inflammation of the udder. Because the cow has mastitis in milk produced by her something rotten, which is not acceptable to the dairy industries (milk dairies to view the high number of cells, which have a large part of the rot), the farmers give antibiotics for the treatment of ailing cows. Growth hormone for beef production, there are serious concerns about the health and welfare of factory farms and their animals who have been injected with growth hormones. Nonprofit organizations such as the Animal Protection Institute, supports family farms and a humane treatment of animals, and check them regularly. At the injection site, and the distance between two points which hormone injections are given, it is very important. Places like the movement of the muscles considerably below the ear, thereby increasing the damage spreads to drugs, and the excitement, the initial injection. Growth hormone rBGH hormone for milk production and health

Growth hormone for beef production

Growth hormone rBGH hormone for milk production and health

Growth hormone for beef production

Environmental Concerns hormone cow manure enters the ecosystem. Manure from factory farms in the area of ground and surface water and groundwater in this area. In addition, the impact of gender and reproductive capacity of fish and aquatic ecosystems, there are concerns about the monitoring of growth hormones get into the food we wat, but there was no convincing studies that are funded. There is one school felt that the use of growth environment and reduce greenhouse gas advocates. They argue that growth hormones, we can produce more milk in less land, raw materials, nutrients, greenhouse gases, excretion – the translation into all round positive impact on the value of the environment. “The same is true of beef and add to growth supporters. Understanding of beef and dairy tags usual – get the education and without labels. Cattle fed the corn and other cereals, feedlot industry, even if it began on the lawn. Grain, instead of the grass, as it is faster and cheaper, faster and deckchairs is the answer, and higher profits. But the blades tough digestive system of cows, and makes them vulnerable to diseases. cows antibiotics. They are also routinely hormone given. USDA Certified Organic – cattle are grass-or grain-based feeds does not contain animal increased. These animals are not given antibiotics (unless required by a veterinarian, and then the animals lose organic status), or growth hormones. that animal welfare concerns, cattle conditions are grown, allowing for the use and adequate freedom of movement and reduce the burden of Species “and” access to pasture. Grass Fed, or Pasture Finished – Those cattle are raised only on grass or hay with no grain. Studies show that grass-fed beef and higher in omega-3 fatty acids than conventional beef contains. No hormones / no antibiotics – USDA allows this label manufacturers, documents, although not check on claims. “hormones were free” and “antibiotic free” is not USDA approved names, and so is absurd. Animal protection against – the new seal nonprofit Animal Protection began ensures that the animals are collected as separate holdings, and access to a seasonal outdoor safe. In addition to humane treatment of animals in all phases. Top. That does not mean much on how the cattle was made. USDA policy is that all fresh meat is natural, and there should be no artificial flavors, colors or preservatives. Source: hormones in food


Feed dealers

Other types of food for your dog

Category : feed additives

These types of foods are made of different materials with different inclination of the dog. Dogs such as dry foods only if they are simply delicious, but only in reference to dog pull canned products. The reason for this preference by the dogs, the case of canned food, humidity around 70-80 percent, but the dry food, it’s only about ten percent. But if this view is often used in relation to nutrients, dry, almost ninety per cent nutrients whereas the canned food items contain only a few percent of nutrients and most of the time involved. It’s just that soy products are so well structured like a piece of meat. Therefore, making the body systems, nutritional balance, the dog has to eat more amounts of canned food materials than the dry material. Thus, comparing the cost efficiency of this feature for you. Many dry food is rice and soybean basis. Now a bit of a dry diet based on corn. Sometimes, beef or chicken based food jars with vitamins and minerals in food supplements health care dog fit. Larger dogs that weigh more than 30 pounds should be fed semi-moist food or dry food in most cases. This is to satisfy the food receptors in the stomach. This is due to the fact that large dogs need a lot of wet food or canned food items to meet these criteria. But it can not practically be higher in these dog possible. Small dogs can be a satisfactory level of nutrients if fed even the moist food. However, the caloric density of the dry food is not far behind. Enriched dry food are highly welcome ones than the non-fortified foods.


Feed dealers